[Bug 2239242] Review Request: fedora-ima - IMA policies and configuration files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239242

Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #1 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
It is quite unusual to have a package without upstream URL. Why is this package
a separate source if it does not have any upstream repository? Wouldn't it make
sense to create fedora-specific subpackage to any package it is related to?

It does not explain what IMA stands for, which packages use it and for what
exactly. I think at least README.md with a bit more descriptive text how and
for what this is used would be useful. Especially with some links to more
detailed page. Would a good candidate be [1]?

I think all files installed into /etc should have %config(noreplace) added to
them, unless very special case.

The spec lacks %prep section, where %autosetup should be present. I think it
expands it into long description, which should not be done.

I would say if this package does not have any upstream, it should have version
0 only. Release incrementals should be enough, until some upstream archive is
used with any version assigned to it.

1. https://sourceforge.net/p/linux-ima/wiki/Home/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239242

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202239242%23c1
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux