Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-11 11:57 EST ------- I do not want to sound harsh and I will try to assist you if you want to follow my advice, but I think it's time to start learning a bit more. Programming is one avenue, packaging is another one and they do not necessarily overlap completely. As long as the src.rpm does not properly build on all architectures (or at least a valid reason to not build is provided) we are not going anywhere. The output of rpmlint for the .i386 binary is relevant, but not sufficient. The final aim is to have no output, i.e. no warning/no error (the unknown-key is a false alarm, can be ignored) AND to have the application built on all architectures supported by Fedora, including ppc and 64 bits. Try to fix your x86_64 environment, come to #fedora/#fedora-devel or use the appropriate mailing lists if you need assistance, but you should first prove that you know the packaging guidelines before getting accepted as contributor. So far you have proven that there is lot of room for improvement. For instance you have to convince your build -- either by modifying the source _in_ the tarball _or_ by patching in %prep -- that the language files should go in the same folder with the binary (if they are architecture dependent). Or maybe somewhere else in the opposite case. Either case, for the moment there is an error which must be solved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review