[Bug 427034] Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427034


mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-01-11 11:12 EST -------
For general packaging guidelines, please refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines


For 0.2.1-2:

* disttag
  - Please consider to use %{?dist} tag.
    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag

* URL
  - Perhaps URL contains some typo :)

* Seemingly unneeded Provides
  - Why do you want to make -plugins subpackage have
    "Provides: nntpgrab-plugin-nntp" or so?

  - Also, "Obsoletes: nntpgrab-plugin-nntp" seems unneeded
    as perhaps Fedora has never had nntpgrab-plugin-nntp
    rpm.

* Dependency between subpackage
  - -devel subpackage should have 
    "Requires: %{name}-core = %{version}-%{release}"

* %configure
  - %configure should be moved to %build.

* Vendor name of desktop file
  - Usually the vendor id of desktop file should be "fedora".
    Do you want to have desktop file named "NNTPGrab-nntpgrab.desktop"?

* libtool .la file <-> .so symlink
  - libtool .la file should be removed unless needed. Instead
   the symlink %{_libdir}/libnntpgrab.so should _not_ be removed
   and this symlink should be included in -devel subpackage.

* defattr
  - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-)

* Directory ownership issue
  - %{_includedir}/nntpgrab is not owned by any packages.

* Dependency for -devel pacakage
  - %_libdir/pkgconfig/nntpgrab.pc contains the line:
--------------------------------------------------------
     9  Requires: glib-2.0
--------------------------------------------------------
    Also %_includedir/nntpgrab/nntpgrab.h contains
--------------------------------------------------------
    22  #include <glib.h>
--------------------------------------------------------
    This means that -devel subpackage should have
    "Requires: glib2-devel".

? plugins
  - By the way, if all files in -plugins package under %_libdir
    directory are only used as plugins called by only dlopen, is
    it possible
    - to move all plugins to some unique directory only used
      by nntpgrab, for example %_libdir/nntpgrab
    - and "rename" (not symlink) libnntpgrab_plugin_nntp.so.0.0.0 to
      libnntpgrab_plugin_nntp.so, for example (as dlopen'ed
      file name is libnntpgrab_plugin_nntp.so)
    (not a blocker) ?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]