[Bug 2242481] Review Request: kf6-kpty - KDE Frameworks 6 Tier 2 module providing Pty abstraction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242481

Steve Cossette <farchord@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Doc Type|---                         |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Steve Cossette <farchord@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Regarding this review, rpmlint complains about me adding utemper as a require.
I can't confirm nor deny that it's required on install, but I did notice it was
required to add the build flag to enable it. 

If the reviewer thinks otherwise, I can remove it. But it seems to still be
used even today:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kf5-kpty/blob/rawhide/f/kf5-kpty.spec


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242481

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202242481%23c1
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux