https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239811 --- Comment #11 from Sandro <gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #10) > I’m also happy to write PR’s like > https://github.com/Donders-Institute/multiecho/pull/19 in cases where > upstream wants it, but in this case it would require rewriting the option > parsing to use argparse. I was wondering, why not use argparse. It's my go to choice when it comes to Python command line utilities. I was quite surprised that the two tools provided behaved differently wrt the switches (`-h` vs. `--help`). Since the person requesting this review is also involved upstream, let's hear him. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239811 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202239811%23c11 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
