https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240957 --- Comment #2 from Troy Dawson <tdawson@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Licensing issues: In you list of Licenses you have MPL, it should be MPL-1.1 So, the other license I believe to be a bug. There is an artistic license file src/lib/licenses/ARTISTIC but I am unable to find anything using that license. BUT the files src/lib/kaboutdata.h and src/lib/kaboutdata.cpp have a function that list licenses, and ARTISTIC is clearly there. I believe there was some code at some point with the ARTISTIC license. It would be good to open a bug to have them remove that bit of code listing the ARTISTIC license, and get rid of the license file. Opening the bug, is optional for this package. I'll approve it without it. Changing MPL to the SDPX license is not, it needs to be changed. That would make the License line to be License: BSD-2-Clause AND BSD-3-Clause AND CC0-1.0 AND GPL-2.0-or-later AND MPL-1.1 AND LGPL-2.0-only AND LGPL-2.1-or-later AND LGPL-3.0-only AND LGPL-2.1-only WITH Qt-LGPL-exception-1.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240957 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202240957%23c2 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
