[Bug 2218338] Review Request: skribilo - A free document production tool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218338



--- Comment #9 from Andrew Bauer <zonexpertconsulting@xxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Ah, that's much cleaner.

Please remove the following from %files. These folders should be owned by the
guile package:
%dir %{_datadir}/guile
%dir %{_datadir}/guile/site
%dir %{_datadir}/guile/site/%{mver}

Rather than %exclude fonts under %files, please delete them instead in %install
and then place a symlink in their place, similar to what I am doing here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-ouimeaux/blob/rawhide/f/python-ouimeaux.spec#_95

What are the .pdf files that are being %excluded? Those should be deleted as
well in %install if they are not being used.

If you are looking for something quick, you could do this one-liner:
find %{buildroot} \( -name .pdf -or- -name .ttf -or -name .otf \) -type f
-delete > /dev/null 2>&1 || :

Don't forget to buildrequire find if you go this route.


There are some unusual package requires:

$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm
ImageMagick-devel
emacs
gettext-devel
glibc-common
glibc-devel
gnupg2
guile-devel
guile-reader-devel
lout
make
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
texlive
texlive-collection-context
/usr/bin/sh
linux-libertine-biolinum-fonts
linux-libertine-fonts
lomt-junction-fonts
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsZstd) <= 5.4.18-1
source-foundry-hack-fonts
texlive-lobster2


Unless skribilo is building something each time it is run, it should not be
pulling in make and -devel packages. 
I'm still looking into how these dependencies snuck in. Let me know if you have
any insight on this.

We are getting there.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218338

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202218338%23c9
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux