Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From mhideo@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-11 05:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > Even if packages are used for development, they cannot end with "-devel". It is > called gcc and not gcc-devel for example. Besides they are numerous occasions > where a package that ends with "-devel" is excluded. A few examples > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/8/FinalTreeTesting > > "Make sure default install doesn't include -devel packages" > > Look at the default kickstart files that are used to generate the GNOME and KDE > live images. They automatically exclude *-devel. In short any package that ends > with -devel is assumed to contain development files (headers et all) and not > development tools in various places throughout Fedora and making an exception > just for this package is unwieldy. You just have to call it something else. Thank you Rahul, Excellent read and I understand that now. It is okay not to include this in the default install. That being the case, is it okay to keep the name -devel? Cheers, Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review