https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241551 --- Comment #3 from Artem <ego.cordatus@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #2) > %global date 20230524 > > -> this hould not be the date of the commit, but the date where you took > the snapshot. Thanks! Can we document this in docs.fedoraproject.org? Last time when i ask about this Fedora maintainers they are still have no clear opinion on this and said as you wish. Date of the commit look more logically here IMO. Would be nice to document this strictly. > - %{_mandir}/*1/*.1* > > please don't glob so much. I am always trying to find a balance between unnecessary chore and some kind of checks/protect from upstream mistakes in future updates. For all this time i've seen upstream mistakenly install in wrong dirs man{1-9} but what else could go wrong in this case? Also nice to document with examples and gotchas. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241551 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202241551%23c3 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
