[Bug 2228155] Review Request: dante - A free SOCKS v4/v5 client implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228155



--- Comment #13 from Steve Cossette <farchord@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Just for clarity's sake:

dante.x86_64: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/lib64/libdsocks.so
dante.x86_64: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname
/usr/lib64/libsocks.so.0.1.1
dante-server.x86_64: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/sbin/sockd

Those are fine, it does make sense considering this is a socks server

dante.src: W: invalid-license BSD-Inferno-Nettverk
dante.x86_64: W: invalid-license BSD-Inferno-Nettverk
dante-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license BSD-Inferno-Nettverk
dante-debugsource.x86_64: W: invalid-license BSD-Inferno-Nettverk
dante-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license BSD-Inferno-Nettverk
dante-server.x86_64: W: invalid-license BSD-Inferno-Nettverk

Can be ignored as it's approved. Checked, as long as it's approved this can go
through.

dante-server.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/sbin/sockd

This one might be a security issue, so I'd probably try to have it fixed
upstream

dante.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libdsocks.so libdsocks.so

This one, if you can get it fixed that would be good.

dante-server.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/sbin/sockd
/lib64/libcom_err.so.2

This one isn't a deal breaker but I'd probably still report it upstream


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228155

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202228155%23c13
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux