Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 afitzsim@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |afitzsim@xxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From afitzsim@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-10 22:23 EST ------- I do not find the naming dilemma to be an issue. Given the google juice the phrase documentation devel already has and the specialized nature of the package, any name will work. This is a tool Intended for technical documentation developers (not first time FOSS users) so we really have no blocking need to specify a brandable project name. That said, I would have supported renaming had it been a trivial move, but I see it will not cause great enough a confusion to warrant its non-inclusion from F9 on this grounds. What would greatly disappoint, is not getting this package into Fedora 9. documentation-devel could greatly serve the content community by bringing a quality publishing tool to books for many free software projects. I know both inkscape and gimp documentation certainly need the improvements this package can offer. The name space is free, the tool is useful lets get this innovation to the fedora community ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review