Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-10 20:55 EST ------- > This package is dependent on this exact version of the xsl and is smaller than > many source packages currently in Fedora. I see, ok - I think I overestimated the size going by its inflated size (36MB). Generally it would be better to use a system package rather than carrying your own copy of it, but if it is really necessary perhaps an exception can be made for now since at least it is not a binary library. > I think that whole discussion is ridiculous, pointless and a complete waste of > time. Well it may seem so to people outside the fedora packaging project, but making an OS is a serious business. With over 5000 packages currently in the distro we need some rules and conventions to prevent pollution of the namespaces. Learning and accepting those conventions is a requisite to joining and working with the project. However I point out that no final decision on the name has been made yet, it is still under discussion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review