Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428352 Summary: Review Request: fedora-idm-console: Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: dennis@xxxxxxxx,fedora-package- review@xxxxxxxxxx,notting@xxxxxxxxxx Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/fedora-idm-console.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/fedora-idm-console-1.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: This provides the Fedora branded console for use with idm-console-framework for Fedora Directory Server. Builds in mock, both f-8 i386 and x86_64. rpmlint says "E: no-binary". This will require a bit of explanation: There appears to be a bug in Java. The default Java java.library.path uses /usr/lib even on 64bit systems. This means that if the app uses JNI, it will not find the 64-bit libs by default. The argument -Djava.library.path=%{_libdir} must be passed to the JRE. This means the package becomes an arch specific package, even though there are no arch specific binaries in the package. This appears to be a bug in Sun Java, IBM Java, and in IcedTea Java. So I would like to propose that this particular rpmlint error be waived for the fedora package review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review