[Bug 2231252] Review Request: yass - lightweight and secure http/socks proxy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231252



--- Comment #45 from Keyue Hu <hukeyue@xxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #44)
> For each bundled package, please indicate if it is not available in Fedora,
> or if it is available in Fedora, why what is packaged cannot be used. For
> example abseil-cpp, asio, icu, nghttp2, protobuf and re2 are available:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/abseil-cpp
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/icu
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nghttp2
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/re2
> 
> Cannot find lss. Maybe can be packaged separately?
> 
> Surprising that system libc++ and libc++std cannot be used.

We don’t use c++ libraries in system because the api changes from time to time.

For example, latest abseil-cpp (20230802 lts) adds new api which is required by
Google test 1.14. You can feed it with old version of abseil-cpp. We don’t
protobuf for now, even though QUIC support requires it. And we don’t use icu
directly but some standalone header checked out from chromium. Re2 library is
used for unit test only and we don’t check the system one yet.

We are using system nghttp2 library.

I don’t know what’s ‘the system libc++ and libc++std’ and how to enable it. For
the rpm spec, it builds with bundled libc++ if it is clang and uses system
libstdc++ if it is gcc. And I don’t know if the system libc++ will work, it is
out of scope because the old libc++ might not support c++20 well and the
debug/assert mode is changed in latest revision. In short, we use upstream
libc++ directly or the system libstdc++.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231252

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202231252%23c45
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux