[Bug 2235088] Review Request: rust-libheif-rs - Safe wrapper around the libheif-sys crate for parsing heif/heic files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235088



--- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember <klember@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Indeed, and I apparently even had updated locally, but forgot to update the
review request:

Spec URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/rust-libheif-rs.spec
SRPM URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/rust-libheif-rs-0.21.0-1.fc40.src.rpm

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=106439272

There's even newer, 0.22.0 release available from upstream now, but that
requires rust-libheif-sys update first, so I've left it out for now to simplify
things. Either version should be fine for glycin-loaders.

One thing I am unsure about is how to handle the test data licensing and if we
should reflect it in the license tag. Upstream cleaned the test data up nicely
and it's all under CC-BY-SA-4.0 now, but didn't reflect the CC-BY-SA-4.0
addition in the crate license. My gut feeling is that this is the right thing
to do, because whatever we put in the license field gets included in the
license field of the packages that consume the rust crate (e.g.
glycin-loaders), and they don't use the test data (and CC-BY-SA-4.0 license) at
all. Maybe an option would be to exclude the test data in %files list?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235088

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235088%23c6
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux