Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From mhideo@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-09 21:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > The upstream name is not right to begin with. I don't know about > a precedent, but I myself ask upstream to change their name when it is > to short or too generic (I did that for g2lib, so far they haven't > acted, but I did what I could). I also made that recommendation for ht. > > But here it is easily done since you are also upstream. The name > of the package is part of the 'quality' of the package and having > a name too generic seems to be to me a good enough reason not to > include it in fedora. There are no precise guidelines about what > makes a package unsuitable for inclusion in fedora (except for license > guidelines), but having a package that abuses the shared > namespaces (package name, library name, binary in /usr/bin name) > is in my opinion a reason sufficient to block a release if upstream is > under the fedora umbrella. > > In any case please try to think at your software name from the > perspective of free software community (other developers and > users) and ask yourself, is my package rightly named? Hi Patrice/Jens, Currently the documentation-devel project is #2 in google's pageranking. Additionally, as requested, here is a link to the project page: https://fedorahosted.org/documentation-devel Based on the google page ranking metric and the provision of additional project documentation for your review, we formally request the preservation of the documentation-devel name for this project. Best regards, Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review