https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132 --- Comment #56 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> --- Why using the old vaapi naming scheme across the distro, for newer packages ? newer naming schema is more like having vaapi-driver in the name. Guideline is pretty clear on that the package name is derived from the source tarball! What justify that such guideline is arbitrary ignored ? Now one can add any virtual provides that make things fit! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201942132%23c56 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
