https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237656 --- Comment #10 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Pierre-YvesChibon from comment #3) > I have two questions for the reviewer: > a/ the project has been renamed due to a potential trademark issue. The > renaming also changed the dbus API used to interact with the main service, > so it's not quite a drop-in replacement. That being said: should bluechi > obsolete hirte? On the one hand, yes because it's a semi-legal driven > renaming, on the other hand, it's not a fully drop-in replacement since the > API changed. > Thoughts? > I think for all the important points that matter, the full Obsoletes+Provides is fine. > b/ when importing bluechi into dist-git, should I preserve the history for > the hirte git repo or start from a clean repo? > > Thanks :) Up to you, though I prefer the history if you can keep it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237656 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237656%23c10 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
