[Bug 2224783] Review Request: dragonbox - Reference implementation of Dragonbox in C++

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224783



--- Comment #9 from Mattia Verga <mattia.verga@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Spec URL: https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/dragonbox/dragonbox.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/dragonbox/dragonbox-1.1.3-1.fc40.src.rpm

So, LibreOffice only needs the headers, therefore I've disabled the build of
the static library and made the package noarch.
Note that Fedora Packaging Guidelines says that only the subpackage should be
noarch, while the main package must be arch'ed so that tests are run. But this
package has no tests, so I see no point in wasting resources to build it
multiple times on all arches... I dropped a note in the specfile, if in future
tests are added (unlikely) I will move the noarch to the subpackage only.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224783

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202224783%23c9
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux