https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134972 --- Comment #16 from Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@xxxxxxx> --- As a FYI, I updated the package to use the rh rpms EFI macros for the ESP/etc. This fixes the complaints in #11 about the efi macros, and also I guess is the "machinery" referenced as well since in theory the rpm macros can update /boot/efi to somewhere else in the filesystem? To be clear I wasn't arguing against those changes (not sure if it came across that way, the point was that we needed to place files in the ESP/etc and ghost/config'ing them should be done regardless of whether anaconda/etc rewrites them.). Also, after some mailing list discussions/etc a change was opened/approved for this and the related changes for F39, so its getting late I either need some clear directions or for this to be approved. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install Thanks, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134972 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202134972%23c16 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
