[Bug 2233324] Review Request: loupe - Image viewer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233324



--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember <klember@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Thanks a lot for reviewing this and all of the dependencies. I really
appreciate the help here.

> Some notes for things that might or might not warrant additional changes:
> 
> 1. Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
>    Note: No known owner of /usr/share/help/fa
> 
> Unsure what this is about. Is "fa" some language identifier that is
> non-standard and not known by our tools?

Looks like it's Persian (Farsi) and part of ISO 639-1, but apparently all of
the directories in /usr/share/help are in limbo: if I do `rpm -qf
/usr/share/help/*`, some directories are owned by deja-dup, but most are listed
as unowned. I'd say maybe 'filesystem' should own them all? What do you think?
Alternatively, we'd need to fix %find_lang to mark them as owned by individual
packages - either way, the fix is not in this package.

> 2. Package must own all directories that it creates.
>    Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/help/fa,
>    /usr/share/dbus-1, /usr/share/help/uk, /usr/share/help/C,
>    /usr/share/dbus-1/services
> 
> Does the package need to require dbus, or should it co-own /usr/share/dbus-1?

I would say it makes sense to require dbus because even basic functions like
launching the app happen over dbus (it has DBusActivatable=true in the desktop
file).

> 3. The package has cargo tests, so it *needs* to have "%bcond_without check".
> Otherwise, any test-only dependencies might not be present for compiling
> tests. This might work right now, but could break with any future version.
> 
> I guess I should really document this (or flip the default for
> %cargo_generate_buildrequires if neither with/without are defined...)

Fixed.

> 4. Replace "BR: rust-packaging" with "BR: cargo-rpm-macros". The former no
> longer exists, and is only provided by the latter for backwards
> compatibility.

Fixed.

--

Thanks again for all the help, Fabio!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233324

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202233324%23c4
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux