[Bug 2232229] Review Request: atlantik - KDE monopd game client

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232229



--- Comment #3 from Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
>[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
>     Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
>     attached diff).

This is due to use of rpmautospec.

> b) The latest version of fedora-review gives:
> Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl,
>      /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv, /usr/share/doc/HTML/es,
>      /usr/share/doc/HTML/ca, /usr/share/doc/HTML, /usr/share/doc/HTML/uk,
>      /usr/share/doc/HTML/de, /usr/share/doc/HTML/it, /usr/share/doc/HTML/en
> see:
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-
> review-2232229-atlantik/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06300120-atlantik/fedora-
> review/review.txt
> Should these be co-owned?

First, the files are these directories are handled entirely by `%find_lang`. 
kde-filesystem does provide those but otherwise it is really intended for KDE 3
and 4.  Some modern KDE apps still Requires: kde-filesystem but many do not, so
this must be a frequent issue.  I can add the requires if you insist but I
think we're looking at a bigger issue here that should probably be solved at a
higher level (either by having %find_lang generate %dir's to co-own these, or
being stricter about Requires: kde-filesystem across the distro, or adding
these directories to a more modern *-filesystem package).

> c) A further warning:
> atlantik-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided kdegames3-devel

In this particular case I believe this is appropriate (which is why it is a
warning and not an error).  It should replace the deprecated kdegames3-devel if
installed but if someone were to (try to) install kdegames3-devel (which simply
by its name implies KDE3) I don't think they would want the KDE 5
atlantik-devel.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232229

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202232229%23c3
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux