https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232042 --- Comment #2 from Maxwell G <maxwell@xxxxxxx> --- > It does not need to be marked with %license It does need to be marked with %license. poetry-core does not provide the necessary metadata for the pyproject macros to do this automatically. The file is in the dist-info directory, but it's not marked with %license. I also prefer to keep licenses in /usr/share/licenses to being with. > b) Should AUTHORS.rst file just be documentation and not license? This is a list of authors who own copyright for parts of the code, so I prefer to mark it with %license. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232042 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202232042%23c2 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
