https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 --- Comment #7 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for the review! (In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #5) > [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/ocaml > > I'm a bit confused by this message from fedora-review, as the package > creates %{ocamldir}/camlp5-buildscripts/ == > /usr/lib64/ocaml/camlp5-buildscripts. ocamldir is owned by the OCaml > package. I also checked this by looking at the final RPM and it all > looks OK to me. Oh, I see. The package does not depend on anything in ocaml-runtime, so it can be installed standalone, leaving /usr/lib64/ocaml without an owner. I'll make this package own that directory, too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202221320%23c7 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
