https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444 --- Comment #73 from Yunying Sun <yunying.sun@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Daniel Berrangé from comment #69) > I looked for other examples of package reviews since this CC0 license > change, and > the recent additino os wasi-libc had to replace the dlmalloc impl with a > different > one under MIT license. They could have chosen to use an older versin of > dlmalloc > under the previous license, don't know why they chose a completely new malloc > impl. So I think the precedent is that after 1 year since the announcement, > adding new packages with CC0 content is no longer permitted. Hi Daniel, About the CC0 license issue, linux-sgx team tended not to downgrade dlmalloc to the CC-PDDC licensed v2.8.4 for security concerns. That leaves two options as we can see: Option 1: We relicense sdk/tlibc/stdlib/malloc.c to BSD by adding a secondary header like what openjdk does: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/AbstractExecutorService.java This is the way the author of dlmalloc recommended. Will this work for Fedora? Option 2: We add note to explain that the original dlmalloc is under CC0, and linux-sgx changes to it is under BSD. Like what wasi-libc has in its License: https://github.com/WebAssembly/wasi-libc/blob/main/LICENSE Despite wasi-libc seems still using dlmalloc as its default: https://github.com/WebAssembly/wasi-libc/blob/main/Makefile#L19 In its package spec, CC0 does not need to be listed anymore in License field: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wasi-libc/blob/rawhide/f/wasi-libc.spec#_9. Which option do you suggest we take? Or any other alternatives? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202085444%23c73 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
