[Bug 2228632] Review Request: rust-bzip2-rs - Pure Rust bzip2 decompressor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228632

Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |POST
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+
             Blocks|                            |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)



--- Comment #13 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Looks good to me, thanks for the update!

===

Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review.

- package builds and installs without errors on rawhide
- test suite is run and all unit tests pass
- latest version of the crate is packaged
- license matches upstream specification (MIT OR Apache-2.0) and is acceptable
for Fedora
- license files are included with %license in %files
- package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines

Package APPROVED.

===

There's some post-import tasks that I usually recommend for Rust packages, but
since this isn't going to be imported yet, I'll give those steps later.

===

Congratulations, you got your first approved package.

Before getting sponsored into the packager group, I suggest that you take a
look here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Packager_sponsor_policy/#requirements

TL;DR: There's a few ways in which you can demonstrate that you understood the
Packaging Guidelines.
In my experience, making high-quality, non-binding reviews of other pending
packages is is usually a good way to get started.

If you decide to continue this way, it's always better to look at a few
different packages, i.e. not do reviews for three very similar packages, but
for example, one written in C using CMake/meson as build system, maybe one
Python package, and one Go / Rust package - you get the idea.

Once that's done, feel free to ping me with links to those reviews (or Pull
Requests, etc.) -
My offer to sponsor you and guide you through the process of submitting your
first package still stands.



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228632

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202228632%23c13
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux