Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421871 danms@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(danms@xxxxxxxxxx) | ------- Additional Comments From danms@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-07 13:02 EST ------- - Removed extra_release - Source URL will be updated when the upstream release is made - Removed explicit Requires - Commented %pre. Following convention here. - Changed to cond-restart - chrpath reports no rpath set on my .so's. CIM providers *are* .so files and must remain as such. See sblim-cmpi-base (et al) for other examples. These are not development libraries, they are plugin-type libraries. SPEC: http://static.danplanet.com/pkg/fedora-9/libvirt-cim.spec SRPM: http://static.danplanet.com/pkg/fedora-9/libvirt-cim-0.1-2.fc9.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review