https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444 --- Comment #67 from Daniel Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> --- # The entire source code is BSD, except some third party projects are > # under other licenses listed in License.txt. > License: BSD and MIT and ASL 2.0 and NCSA/MIT and CC0 and FBSDDL and OpenSSL and zlib and GPL and BSD/GPLv2 and EPL-1.0 I think this license list is probably incomplete. Running the licensecheck -r . | sed -e 's/^.*: //' -e 's/\*No copyright\* //' | sort | uniq -c 2653 Apache License 2.0 9 Apache License 2.0 [generated file] 1 BSD 2-clause FreeBSD License 90 BSD 2-Clause License 1 BSD 2-Clause License Apache License 2.0 5 BSD 2-clause NetBSD License BSD 2-Clause License 4355 BSD 3-Clause License 3 BSD 3-Clause License Apache License 2.0 1 BSD 3-Clause License BSD 2-Clause License 1 BSD 3-Clause License BSD 2-Clause License Eclipse Public License 1.0 22 BSD 3-Clause License GNU General Public License, Version 2 1 BSD 4-Clause License 1 BSD 4-Clause License BSD 3-Clause License 2 BSD-4-Clause (University of California-Specific) 4 FSF All Permissive License 2 FSF Unlimited License [generated file] 1 GNU General Public License v2.0 or later Apache License (v2.0) or GNU General Public License (v2.0 or later) 2 GNU General Public License, Version 2 102 ISC License 1 Microsoft Public License BSD 3-Clause License 1464 MIT License 2 MIT License BSD 3-Clause License 129 OpenSSL License 4 OpenSSL License Apache License 1.0 10 OpenSSL License BSD 3-Clause License 5 Public domain 3 Public domain BSD 3-Clause License 9 SSLeay 18 Standard ML of New Jersey License 6 University of Illinois/NCSA Open Source License 4616 UNKNOWN 56 UNKNOWN [generated file] 2 zlib License Now I wouldn't blindly trust the output of this tool, because it certainly makes mistakes, and not all source is relevant to what goes into the binary RPM. For each reported license scenario here, need to check if there is at least 1 file that's relevant to the binary RPM. At least the ISC license appears relevant and isn't listed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202085444%23c67 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
