[Bug 2018698] Review Request: fs-uae 3.0.5 - Amiga emulator with on-screen GUI and online play support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2018698



--- Comment #13 from Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
If I understand correctly (please correct me if I am confused), you want to
include in a Fedora package at least one of these files:
https://github.com/FrodeSolheim/fs-uae/blob/master/share/fs-uae/aros-amiga-m68k-ext.bin
https://github.com/FrodeSolheim/fs-uae/blob/master/share/fs-uae/aros-amiga-m68k-rom.bin
(you didn't specify this previously but I assume these are what you mean by
AROS ROMs)

These are apparently generated by the AROS project. I think your view is that
this should be allowed under an interpretation of Fedora's firmware exception.
The problem is that unlike typical nonfree firwmare licenses allowed by Fedora,
which are generally assumed to be self-compliant, the AROS license (which I'm
assuming applies to those .bin files) is a copyleft open source license with a
source availability requirement. The AROS license is essentially an old style
of vanity MPL derivative and would likely be acceptable for Fedora. 

It isn't clear whether the fs-uae project itself is compliant with this
license. In any event, Fedora would have to comply with the AROS license. 

This might be clearer (or it is for me anyway) if we imagine the AROS ROMs are
GPLv2-covered Linux kernel binaries for some exotic architecture Fedora itself
has no build systems for (there was in fact a historical case like this
involving a linux-firmware file, IIRC). Surely Fedora could not ship such
binaries without some solution to GPL source code compliance requirements. 

So I think you would need to (a) see if the source code of these ROMs is
available, and confirm that source code is entirely under Fedora-allowed
licenses, (b) get approval from FESCo to include the ROMs in a Fedora package
given that these are third-party-built binary files, (c) come up with a plan
for how Fedora will meet the source code requirements of the AROS license and
get approval for that. 

BTW this license would not be allowed in Fedora:
https://github.com/FrodeSolheim/fs-uae/blob/master/licenses/ipflib.txt
I don't know what that covers in the fs-uae repository.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2018698

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202018698%23c13
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux