https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224501 --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Felix: the files in libb64 are CC-PDDC but the license comment says MIT, please fix. Some files are actually BSD-2-Clause (including files in iniparser despite the license file claiming it is MIT; I re-checked licensecheck's output and some files definitely have BSD headers) BSD 2-Clause License -------------------- libsc-83bd019fc9f029a9c15a3ae823e6d7d20e6e0340/iniparser/inistring.c libsc-83bd019fc9f029a9c15a3ae823e6d7d20e6e0340/iniparser/inistring.h libsc-83bd019fc9f029a9c15a3ae823e6d7d20e6e0340/src/sc3_mpi_types.h libsc-83bd019fc9f029a9c15a3ae823e6d7d20e6e0340/src/sc_uint128.c libsc-83bd019fc9f029a9c15a3ae823e6d7d20e6e0340/src/sc_uint128.h libsc-83bd019fc9f029a9c15a3ae823e6d7d20e6e0340/test/test_helpers.c libsc-83bd019fc9f029a9c15a3ae823e6d7d20e6e0340/test/test_version.c LGPL-2.0-or-later should be LGPL-2.1-or-later Please declare the bundling of libb4 and iniparser, see https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling and ship their LICENSE texts as well (renaming if necessary to avoid conflicts) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224501 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202224501%23c2 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
