https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218606 --- Comment #16 from Link Dupont <link@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- You're correct. Using build tags just alters the state of the `migrate` binary, but doesn't change the resulting "gocode" package. I assumed that having source files in the -devel package would be harmless enough, but it appears that they're still used to generate dependencies. I reworked the spec file significantly again. This time I took the "removal approach" as you suggest. I also took the time to include any driver that has dependencies already packaged in Fedora. So the drivers that are removed are the ones that are missing a dependency. It's not as daunting a list as I first assumed, but it's still large enough that I don't want to complicate this review unnecessarily. The good news is many common database and source drivers are now included. Spec URL: https://linkdupont.fedorapeople.org/reviews/migrate.spec SRPM URL: https://linkdupont.fedorapeople.org/reviews/migrate-4.16.2-1.fc39.src.rpm Fedora Review: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/linkdupont/reviews/fedora-38-x86_64/06186335-migrate/fedora-review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218606 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202218606%23c16 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
