[Bug 427618] Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427618





------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah@xxxxxxxxx  2008-01-05 13:38 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)

> Problems:
> 1. License field says GPLv2+, but
> src/libc_wrapper.c has MIT license (GPLv2+ compatible)
so should I add GPLv2+ and MIT ?
> src/backend/i2c.c and nv40.c have some additional (apart from the GPL) clauses -
> can you verify that they don't impose any restrictions over GPL terms?

I asked upstream and got this response 
"it are just some pieces from xfree86, the same stuff that is now in the xorg nv
driver"

> 2. This part could use a little more spacing for legibility:
> [...]
> %package gtk
> Summary: Nvclock gtk frontend
> Group: Applications/System
> %description gtk
> This package contains the nvclock gui.
> [...]

ok

> 3. make is called without %{?_smp_mflag} and no comment is present explaining why.

because the build fails; have not yet investigated why .. will add a comment.

> 4. Since the icon you add is 48x48, why not put it in
> %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/
> ?
> Of course, then you need to add
> %post gtk
> touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
> if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then
>   %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || :
> fi
> 
> %postun gtk
> touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
> if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then
>   %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || :
> fi

OK, will do.

> 5. Why aren't you building the QT interface? AFAICT it builds and works just as
> well as the GTK interface.
> 

Because its unmaintained and upstream is planning to drop it completly. 



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]