Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2008-01-05 04:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #88) > Would someone comment on the following thread? > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-January/msg00002.html > > I questioned about "release of subpackage with version different from main rpm" > and the answer was generally this should not occur. In general, yes, but for texlive it makes sense. Texlive is a bit like perl in that it is more than a single package, but a distribution. I think that some subpackages should be completly out of texlive (see above), but some will anyway stay in texlive, and for the others we are waiting for review requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review