[Bug 2221357] Review Request: rust-archery - Abstract over the atomicity of reference-counting pointers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221357

Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx
             Status|NEW                         |POST
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review.

- package builds and installs without errors on rawhide
- test suite is run and all unit tests pass
- latest version of the crate is packaged
- license matches upstream specification (MPL-2.0) and is acceptable for Fedora
- license file is included with %license in %files
- package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines

Package APPROVED.

===

Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks:

- set up package on release-monitoring.org:
  project: $crate
  homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate
  backend: crates.io
  version scheme: semantic
  version filter: alpha;beta;rc;pre
  distro: Fedora
  Package: rust-$crate

- add @rust-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer
  (should happen automatically)

- set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional)

- track package in koschei for all built branches
  (should happen automatically once rust-sig is co-maintainer)

===

Minor nit-pick: Please add a comment to the Patch in the spec file (something
like "criterion dependency is used only for running benchmarks, which does not
happen during package builds, tests that use compiletest_rs are not included in
published sources, ...).

Hint for future Rust packages: I strongly recommend using rust2rpm's "-p" flag
for patching Cargo.toml files. This happens so frequently that it's mostly
automated. Also, some changes to Cargo.toml metadata will trigger changes to
how the spec file is generated, so making these changes manually *after* the
spec is already generated will lead to a spec file that is out of sync with the
actual package contents. When using "rust2rpm -p", changes to Cargo.toml are
taken into account when generating the spec file.

Hint number two: Use the "-s" flag for rust2rpm. It saves you from having to
run "spectool -g" separately. :)

Welcome to Rust packaging! 😅


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221357

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202221357%23c1
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux