[Bug 2183981] Review Request: dsda-doom - Speedrun-oriented Doom source port

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183981



--- Comment #4 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
> Reading the file, expect it should just be GPL v2 or later, LGPL v2.1 or later seems to apply only if used
> outside of Doom, BSD3-Clause seems to have an additional clause:
The clause mentions GZDoom specifically, and DSDA-Doom, being based on PrBoom+,
is not a GZDoom fork.
I guess one might ask the question "what qualifies as a derivative"?

> Maybe check with legal as well since license modifications generally need checking:
This file was already present in prboom+ and there were no issues there,
but given the question above, asking legal won't hurt.

> c) There seem to be some old tests which use rtest. Might it be possible to enable these?
>    They are not enabled in GitHub CI, so maybe they should be removed or updated.
You mean the stuff inside `spec/`? The problem with those is that they require
commercial DOOM .wad files to function.
*Maybe* the tests using Valiant and Rush wads could be run.

d) Should the icon also be setup used by the desktop file?
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean.

e) Should the desktop file be validated?
It is. "desktop-file-install" validates the file before installing.
Calling "desktop-file-validate" separately is needed only when installing
through some other method.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183981

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202183981%23c4
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux