[Bug 2213078] Review Request: goldendict-ng - The Next Generation GoldenDict

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213078

Felix Wang <topazus@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(topazus@outlook.c |
                   |om)                         |



--- Comment #9 from Felix Wang <topazus@xxxxxxxxxxx> ---
> - Please resolve the Conflicts by renaming the binaries

The upstream maintainer said that:
> Not changing binary name & resource name has a few benefits :)

https://github.com/xiaoyifang/goldendict-ng/issues/729#issuecomment-1609192553
https://github.com/xiaoyifang/goldendict-ng/issues/690

> - Introduce the pkgconfig requires for the remaining libraries.

Done.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213078

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202213078%23c9
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux