https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214624 --- Comment #2 from Arthur Bols <arthur@xxxxxxxx> --- Hi Benson, thanks for the review! > a) Should the foundry be FRJN as listed at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/vendors/ > if so, then probably the name should be > FRJN-intel-one-mono-fonts That seems to be the correct foundry, but I'm not sure if it's needed. There is currently only a single font family published and it has quite a niche use case. I think it's clearer to users if it's left out. > b) A number of files have SIL OFL 1.0, perhaps raise an issue upstream > SIL Open Font License 1.0 This seems to be a bug in licensecheck. I checked with exiftool, the files do show SIL 1.1. I'll open an issue in the licensecheck project. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214624 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202214624%23c2 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
