https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217167 --- Comment #4 from Mads Kiilerich <mads@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #2) > This is correct, however you could likely drop the now-empty "web" feature > as well. You mean by manually making additional changes to the files generated by rust2rpm? Is there a good workflow to maintain such packages when we not just can run rust2rpm again in the future? (Also, it seems like it could be a rust2rpm feature request to remove such empty features completely.) Ok, I guess the license files is a blocker. Trying to resolve that upstream. Meanwhile, an update with web feature removed: Spec URL: https://kiilerix.fedorapeople.org/rust-whoami.spec SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/535/102560535/rust-whoami-1.4.0-2.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217167 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202217167%23c4 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue