https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142363 --- Comment #2 from Jan Drögehoff <sentrycraft123@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Benson Muite from comment #1) > Comments: > a) Can the source be put on Pagure or some other forge? See for example: > https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/blob/master/f/rpm/macros.d/macros.go-srpm > Python and Lua seems not to use another forge: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-macros > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lua-rpm-macros the plan was to put it on src.fedoraproject.org, like python and lua do it. But for that I'd need the package approved so I can put in the request. > b) Please add a license file With the answer to a) this would implicitly put all macros under MIT (just like the python macros), but I can add one explicitly if thats desired. > c) Can %{_rpmmacrodir} be used instead of %{_rpmconfigdir}/macros.d ? Can do > d) Maybe the name should just be zig-rpm-macros with the srpm marcos as a > subpackage? That would probably be better, I'll have to work out which macro would be best for each package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142363 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202142363%23c2 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
