[Bug 2168110] Review Request: php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10 - PHP code coverage information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168110



--- Comment #17 from Benson Muite <benson_muite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-Clause License", "*No copyright*
     BSD 3-Clause License", "MIT License". 247 files have unknown license.
     Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/FedoraPackaging/reviews/php-phpunit-php-code-
     coverage10/2168110-php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.

PHP:
[x]: Run phpci static analyze on all php files.
     Note: 6.5.5@7852058 static analyze results in
     /home/FedoraPackaging/reviews/php-phpunit-php-code-
     coverage10/2168110-php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10/phpci.log


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10-10.1.2-1.fc39.noarch.rpm
          php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10-10.1.2-1.fc39.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp6nolngb0')]
checks: 31, packages: 2

php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/CodeCoverage10/Report/Html/Renderer/Template/css/custom.css
php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10.spec:144: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
bundled(js-popper)
php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10-10.1.2-db1497e.tgz
php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10.noarch: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/CodeCoverage10/Report/Html/Renderer/Template/coverage_bar_branch.html.dist
/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/CodeCoverage10/Report/Html/Renderer/Template/coverage_bar.html.dist
php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10.noarch: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/CodeCoverage10/Report/Html/Renderer/Template/dashboard_branch.html.dist
/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/CodeCoverage10/Report/Html/Renderer/Template/dashboard.html.dist
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings, 1 badness; has taken
0.9 s 




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 1

php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/CodeCoverage10/Report/Html/Renderer/Template/css/custom.css
php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10.noarch: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/CodeCoverage10/Report/Html/Renderer/Template/coverage_bar_branch.html.dist
/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/CodeCoverage10/Report/Html/Renderer/Template/coverage_bar.html.dist
php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10.noarch: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/CodeCoverage10/Report/Html/Renderer/Template/dashboard_branch.html.dist
/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/CodeCoverage10/Report/Html/Renderer/Template/dashboard.html.dist
 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings, 1 badness; has taken
0.2 s 



Requires
--------
php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    (php-composer(nikic/php-parser) >= 4.15 with php-composer(nikic/php-parser)
< 5)
    (php-composer(phpunit/php-file-iterator) >= 4.0 with
php-composer(phpunit/php-file-iterator) < 5)
    (php-composer(phpunit/php-text-template) >= 3.0 with
php-composer(phpunit/php-text-template) < 4)
    (php-composer(sebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup) >= 3.0 with
php-composer(sebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup) < 4)
    (php-composer(sebastian/complexity) >= 3.0 with
php-composer(sebastian/complexity) < 4)
    (php-composer(sebastian/environment) >= 6.0 with
php-composer(sebastian/environment) < 7)
    (php-composer(sebastian/lines-of-code) >= 2.0 with
php-composer(sebastian/lines-of-code) < 3)
    (php-composer(sebastian/version) >= 4.0 with
php-composer(sebastian/version) < 5)
    (php-composer(theseer/tokenizer) >= 1.2.0 with
php-composer(theseer/tokenizer) < 2)
    php(language)
    php-composer(fedora/autoloader)
    php-date
    php-dom
    php-json
    php-libxml
    php-pcre
    php-reflection
    php-spl
    php-tokenizer
    php-xmlwriter



Provides
--------
php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10:
    bundled(js-bootstrap)
    bundled(js-d3)
    bundled(js-jquery)
    bundled(js-nvd3)
    bundled(js-popper)
    php-composer(phpunit/php-code-coverage)
    php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10



Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2168110
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, PHP, Generic
Disabled plugins: Python, Ruby, R, Perl, fonts, SugarActivity, C/C++, Java,
Haskell, Ocaml
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Comments:
a) Is there a version for bundled js-popper?
b) Could the bundled javascript libraries that are already be packaged used?
Unclear if there is a strong dependency on the version.
c) phpcompatinfo section, line 127, has requires that include:

Requires:       php-date
Requires:       php-pcre
Requires:       php-reflection
Requires:       php-spl
Requires:       php-tokenizer

phpcompatinfo gives these as requirements, but they 
are also listed below line 89 of the spec file.

phpcompatinfo also lists pcov, but not sure
if this is only required in a few cases.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168110

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202168110%23c17
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux