[Bug 2215078] Review Request: libjodycode - General purpose utility functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215078

Felix Wang <topazus@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |topazus@xxxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #1 from Felix Wang <topazus@xxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Issues:
=======
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
  Note: libjodycode : /usr/include/libjodycode.h
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#_devel_packages
- Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if
  present.
  Note: Package has .a files: libjodycode. Illegal package name:
  libjodycode. Does not provide -static: libjodycode.
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries

libjodycode.x86_64: E: static-library-without-debuginfo
/usr/lib64/libjodycode.a
libjodycode.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/libjodycode.h
libjodycode.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libjodycode.a
 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings, 1 badness; has taken
0.3 s

a) Is there any possibility of avoiding packaging the static library file? If
really necessary, create a -static package to store the static lib.

b) put the header file into -devel subpackage.

c) 

> %forgesetup
> %patch -P 0 -p1

the two lines could be replaced by
```
%forgeautosetup -p1
```

d)
> Patch0:         libjodycode-2.0.1-Makefile.patch

add comment above the patch line to explain.
ref:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/PatchUpstreamStatus/#_all_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215078

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202215078%23c1
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux