https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133551 --- Comment #36 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #34) > RPM cannot parse the linked spec file - the %{gittag} macro is undefined > (and it looks like it's no longer used). It was cut and paste directly from the packaging guidelines you suggested in comment 18, point 3. I will remove. > Additionally, at first glance, "%global debug_package %{nil}" is a red flag. > It should not be needed - but if it *is* needed to make RPM happy, then the > package is built without debuginfo, i.e. with nonstandard compiler flags. I > can't see any indication of custom cargo profiles, so likely "%global > debug_package %{nil}" can just be removed to restore debuginfo subpackage > generation. Probabky a left over of the 100 revisions. Can't those just be fixed on commit? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133551 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202133551%23c36 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
