[Bug 2214269] openssl-pkcs11-sign-provider: OpenSSL 3.0 provider for pkcs#11 (private key operations only)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214269

Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> ---
formal review is here, see the notes explaining OK* and BAD statuses below:

OK      source files match upstream:
            4e28e1e21ee93bd15c8ae9fe6cad565d417bc0f2
openssl-pkcs11-sign-provider-1.0.0.tar.gz
OK      package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
OK*     specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros
consistently.
OK      dist tag is present.
OK      license field matches the actual license.
OK      license is open source-compatible (Apache-2.0). License text included
in package.
OK      latest version is being packaged.
OK      BuildRequires are proper.
OK      compiler flags are appropriate.
OK      package builds in mock (Rawhide/ppc64le).
OK      debuginfo package looks complete.
OK      rpmlint is silent.
OK      final provides and requires look sane.
N/A     %check is present and all tests pass.
OK      no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
OK      owns the directories it creates.
OK      doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK      no duplicates in %files.
OK      file permissions are appropriate.
OK      no scriptlets present.
OK      code, not content.
OK      documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
OK      %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK      no headers.
OK      no pkgconfig files.
OK      no libtool .la droppings.
OK      not a GUI app.

- I think you can switch to %autochangelog in addition to %autorelease before
importing, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/rpmautospec for some
details

The package is APPROVED and I will sponsor you into the packager group as well.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214269

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202214269%23c6
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux