https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192986 --- Comment #11 from Pavel Solovev <daron439@xxxxxxxxx> --- > e) wlroots and package in Fedora is not too old: https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/wlroots/wlroots/ > It may work instead of bundled one. Checking this. It definitely won't. There were many changes. > The fork of udis86 has had many changes compared to what is in: https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/udis86/udis86/ >Maybe it is better creating a separate package? Is there some example of such case in the fedora repos? I am not sure how to do that, it'd provide lib, binary, headers with the same names. > f) Some warnings in build log: Those are not scary, I think... Spec URL: https://solopasha.fedorapeople.org/for-review/hyprland.spec SRPM URL: https://solopasha.fedorapeople.org/for-review/hyprland-0.26.0-2.fc38.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192986 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202192986%23c11 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
