https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209759 --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for the input. I've updated to 5.5.1 and have taken in the suggestions: Spec URL: https://mystro256.fedorapeople.org/rocclr.spec SRPM URL: https://mystro256.fedorapeople.org/rocclr-5.5.1-1.fc39.src.rpm copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mystro256/rocm-hip/build/5971554/ Enabling docs throws a bunch of file-contains-date-and-time rpmlint warnings, which I haven't looked into yet. I'm still somewhat puzzled by the aarch64 error. There might be a bug in the code defining something it shouldn't or similar. I might just only build opencl on aarch64. As for rocm-device-libs, I am the maintainer of that too, and I've actually been considering moving it to the clang resource dir for a while now based on upstream's suggestion. I was really hoping upstream would fix the default install location for me, but it seems like I'll need to deal with it myself. If you're not aware, I patch the location in source as the default is not FHS compliant: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rocm-device-libs/blob/rawhide/f/0001-Use-FHS-compliant-install.patch Tom or Tom, let me know if you have any thoughts on this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209759 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
