https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209759 Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tstellar@xxxxxxxxxx Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |needinfo?(tstellar@redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx> --- The documentation could be improved by adding BuildRequires: doxygen Lots of docs will be generated. A change to fix the no executable stack diff --git a/rocclr.spec b/rocclr.spec index 0752e05..73fb54e 100644 --- a/rocclr.spec +++ b/rocclr.spec @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Name: rocclr Version: %{rocm_version} -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: ROCm Compute Language Runtime Url: https://github.com/ROCm-Developer-Tools/clr License: MIT @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ sed -i "s|\(/usr/bin/\)env perl|\1perl|" HIP-rocm-%{version}/bin/hipcc.pl %build %cmake \ + -DCMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS=-Wl,-z,noexecstack \ -DHIP_COMMON_DIR=$(realpath HIP-rocm-%{version}) \ -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=%{_lib} \ -DHIP_PLATFORM=amd \ @@ -251,5 +252,8 @@ fi %exclude %{_datadir}/hip/samples %changelog +* Sun May 28 2023 Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx> - 5.5.0-2 +- Add noexecstack linker option + * Tue May 16 2023 Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt at hotmail dot com> - 5.5.0-1 - Initial package A couple of things. in the config step of this package -- ROCm Agent Enumurator Not Found BuildRequires and Requires should have rocminfo package I am testing by building rocBLAS, so far i have had to export DEVICE_LIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/amdgcn/bitcode there should be a automatic connect between where rocm-device-libs installs this bitcode dir and where hipcc/clang picks them up with '--rocm-device-lib-path' Tom Stellar what do you think ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209759 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue