[Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971





------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx  2008-01-02 11:36 EST -------
>From the the build.log
* Use of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
cc -I/builddir/build/BUILD/ivtv-1.0.3/utils/../driver -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -Wall -g
   ivtv-radio.c   -o ivtv-radio
This mean that our $RPM_OPT_FLAGS aren't took, there is a problem with the perl
patch in %prep.

Others dynamic patches in %prep that are related to the driver part could be
dropped...

* Missing %{?_smp_mflags} when doing make at %build step
(if it do not work, you have to tell it within the spec).

* Checks if Requirements are sane:
Requires: /usr/bin/perl ivtv-firmware libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) perl(Getopt::Long) rtld(GNU_HASH)
The above line show the requirement for the ivtv package, it has /usr/bin/perl
and perl(Getopt::Long) that are bring by the /usr/share/ivtv/ivtvfwextract.pl

* The README.utils state that:
----------------------------------------------------
v4l2-ctl
--------
This is a copy of the same utility that is available from the linux
v4l-dvb repository (www.linuxtv.org). It can be used to set, list and
get almost everything that the v4l2 API offers.

ivtvctl
-------
Similar to v4l2-ctl, but only contains ivtv-specific features. Eventually
all ivtv functionality should be moved into v4l2-ctl, and then this
utility will be removed.
----------------------------------------------------
So I wonder if v4l2-ctl will conflict the v4l-dvb tools. For now I think
providing v4l2-ctl with ivtv is better, but we might monitor if this package
will be replaced by something from http://www.video4linux.org/browser

So to sum-up: there is a need to check for $RPM_OPT_FLAGS and add  %{?_smp_mflags}.

@Juha Tuomala - I would say if you can test it would be fine, but I have no
doubt that the package works... What is checked here is about fine tuning the
package against the Fedora builsystem and guidelines.
Which card do you own for information ?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]