[Bug 2189083] Review Request: juicefs - a distributed POSIX file system built on top of Redis and S3.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189083



--- Comment #2 from Herald <yuhr123@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Hi Benson,

Thank you for providing such detailed information. It has been very helpful.

Indeed, I conducted compilation tests on servers in different countries and
discovered that the RPM packaging failed due to version changes in some go
modules that juicefs v1.0.4 depends on. As a result, the specified version
couldn't be obtained.

The good news is that JuiceFS v1.0.5 will be released soon, and it addresses
the dependency issues with go module versions. Once the new version is
released, I will update the juicefs.spec file accordingly. I kindly request
your assistance in handling it at that time.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189083
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux