https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203529 --- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks. Spec and srpm updated in place. The zlib license applies only to the bundled copy of zlib, which is not used. But to make things clearer, I now remove internal-complibs/ in %prep. The bsd-2-clause license applies to xxhash. There was one bundled copy in internal-complibs/zstd, and another in plugins/codecs/ndlz/. The second one was used. Now I also remove it in %prep, and use the system copy. (xxhash-devel is pulled in as dependency.) With the above cleanups, I think BSD-3-Clause is the only license actually used by any file that gets compiled or installed. License field is adjusted accordingly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203529 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
