[Bug 2182063] Review Request: python-immutabledict - Drop-in replacement for dictionaries where immutability is desired

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182063

Maxwell G <maxwell@xxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Doc Type|---                         |If docs needed, set a value
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |maxwell@xxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |maxwell@xxxxxxx



--- Comment #2 from Maxwell G <maxwell@xxxxxxx> ---
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


- [x] The License tag reflects the package contents and uses the correct
identifiers.


- [!] The license text is included and marked with %license.


- [x] The package builds successfully in mock.
- [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review).


- [!] There are no relevant rpmlint errors.

> python3-immutabledict.noarch: W: no-documentation

Please include the README in the package.


- [x] The package runs tests in %check.

Yes, but if you're going to add a check bcond, then you should also
conditionalize the `BuildRequires: pytest`.

I'd change

```
BuildRequires:  pytest
```

to

```
%if %{with check}
BuildRequires:  python3-pytest
%endif
```


- [!] The latest version is packaged or packaging an earlier version is
justified.

The latest version is 2.2.4.

- [!] Packager considers avoiding confusing `%foo_name` macros. (Not a blocker)

I'd suggest removing

```
%global modname immutabledict
```

and just use the literal value everywhere.


- [x] Libraries: The package name has a `python3-` prefix and uses the
canonical project name
- [-] Applications: A `python3-` prefix is not used
- [x] The pyproject macros are used
- [x] There are no bundled libraries


- [!] The package complies with the Python and general Packaging Guidelines.

The missing license texts are a problem.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182063
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux